Industries
Built for logistics and 3PL companies — freight invoices, systems that don’t talk, and scorecards clients expect.
A freight invoice, a warehouse management system and a transportation management system each hold a different number for the same shipment, and a client asking for a scorecard wants one number, not three. Exceptions get caught by whoever happens to notice, not by anything built to watch for them.
What this usually looks like
company delivery historyfounder-asserted
company delivery historyfounder-asserted
company delivery historyfounder-asserted
| The problem | What it actually costs | Where we answer it |
|---|---|---|
| Freight invoices don’t match the rates in the carrier contract, and finding the discrepancy means auditing a sample of invoices by hand, not the whole file. | Overpayment that goes unnoticed until someone audits a sample of invoices by hand, if ever. | Reconciliation & close |
| Your WMS and TMS each hold their own version of a shipment’s status, and an exception gets caught by whoever happens to notice rather than anything that watches for one. | A status update somebody chases by phone, and a client who finds out about the exception before you do. | Automation & Integration |
| A client wants one scorecard number for on-time performance, damage and invoice accuracy, and today that means three exports stitched together by hand. | A scorecard that takes a day to assemble and is already stale by the time the client opens it. | Data Engineering & Analytics |
We have built invoice and inventory reconciliations, and automated month-end close processes, across internal systems, databases and systems of record.
company delivery historyfounder-asserted
Backgrounds on the team include support systems at Intel, automation at DHL, and server support at HP.
past employment of individual engineers, not AS DataWorks client workfounder-supplied
The discipline is the same regardless of facility count: least-privilege access during an assessment, a tested rollback before anything changes, a written plan before the work starts, and a documented handover at the end — published in full at Trust and security.
Built for
- Logistics and 3PL companies with 15 to 500 employees in the United States.
- Freight invoices, a WMS and a TMS that each hold their own version of a shipment, and a client waiting on a scorecard assembled by hand.
- A real deadline: a client’s scorecard requirement, an audit finding, an acquisition, or a system nobody has tested a recovery plan for.
- A buyer who wants the plan, the risk register and the cost in writing before committing to either us or the project.
Not a fit
- You run inside a parent carrier’s or franchisor’s technology stack with no system of your own to reconcile — that platform’s owner is the right fit, not us.
- You operate a single facility on one system with nothing to reconcile — there is no problem here for us to solve.
- You need the carrier compliance audit, a customs-bond attestation, or the opinion itself. We build and document environments that stand up to that review; we do not issue the opinion.
- Your only driver is "the board wants a cloud strategy" with no operational problem underneath it. The assessment will probably tell you to stay where you are, and we will still charge for it.
Where logistics work continues
The two pages every logistics buyer needs before booking a call.
Start with the assessment, not the migration.
Book an assessment call30 minuteswith the engineer who would scope the work[PLACEHOLDER: written-summary turnaround, not yet committed]